Pensions - Articles - Proposals will not open a flood of DC money into illiquids


The ACA has responded to the DWP consultation on Facilitating Investment in Illiquid Assets. The response recognises the benefits that investing in illiquid assets may bring to members of DC schemes, but says it isn’t convinced that the proposals to incorporate statements in oft ignored compliance documents will facilitate their adoption.

 Commenting on the response, Tess Page, ACA DC Committee Chair said: “From a practical perspective, we see no issues with the additional requirements for the disclosures in the Statement of Investment Principles (SIP) and the disclose and explain policy for Chair’s Statements.

 “From a member perspective, there is value in ensuring that individuals are able to access clear information in a consistent format across their various pension arrangements. The approach set out in the proposals supports this. We do however note that in our experience the Chair’s Statement is not the “go-to” source of information for even the most engaged members. We welcome the DWP’s acknowledgement in 2021 that the Chair’s Statement, in its current form, is not working as a document intended for multiple audiences.

 “From a trustee decision-making perspective, we are not convinced that being prompted to comment on policies on illiquid assets in the SIP, or providing asset allocations in the Chair’s Statement, will drive material interest and investment in illiquid assets. There is a danger that the wording becomes “boiler plate” in nature, for example by explaining that these assets are not used because charges remain high and availability of suitable vehicles remains low. At the margin, it may prompt discussion for some trustee boards. We have seen examples where other issues such as policies on climate change and other ESG risks and opportunities becomes “template” in nature rather than driving change.”

 The ACA response says it would be open to the disclosures being required to cover self-select funds rather than focusing on default arrangements. It can be “easier” to introduce illiquid assets as part of a self-select range (owing to there being fewer constraints on charges), and trustees being prompted to consider this may allow confidence to be built on such options in advance of future incorporation in a default arrangement.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Half of pensioner homeowners do not check State Benefits
Pensioner homeowners struggling with rising living costs urged to review State Benefit eligibility after new research shows nearly half have never che
Pensions are a long term investment and have time to recover
Experts from pension and investment specialists Quantum Advisory addressed members of the Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) on the tu
State auto enrolment credits could reduce Gender Pension Gap
The Government should introduce State auto-enrolment credits for career breaks and radically change the framework of occupational pensions to reduce t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.