Pensions - Articles - Public sector pensions remedy must be applied efficiently


At the end of last week the Government announced its proposals for addressing the issues arising from the transitional arrangements introduced when the public service pension schemes were reformed in 2014 and 2015 – following the McCloud and Sargeant rulings that these changes represented unlawful discrimination.

 The estimated cost of the resulting additional member benefits of nearly £20bn represents broadly an extra 1% being added to the total value of future public service pensions that have been earned to date - and seems to be unavoidable in the circumstances given the background to the changes and the legal rulings that they represent unlawful discrimination.

 Commenting on the future approach, Bart Huby, Chair of the Association of Consulting Actuaries’ (ACA) Pensions in Public Services Committee, said: “What will be important, whichever approach is used - the Government is consulting on two options - is that the remedy is implemented efficiently and effectively for each public service scheme. In particular, with around 3 million members needing to make a decision on which scheme to be in, it will be vital that affected members are given sufficient information and guidance to properly understand the decisions they are being asked to make and are provided with adequate support in making those decisions.

 “If this doesn’t happen, there will be a real risk that some members will make what is in retrospect a bad decision, and then subsequently claim they weren’t adequately supported by their scheme – leading potentially to further uncertainty and extra costs.”

 Karen Goldschmidt, the Chair of the ACA’s Pensions Taxation Committee added: “It’s also worth noting that the main consultation document contains 8 pages on pensions taxation issues – primarily focusing on how to reverse out the additional tax that might otherwise be payable by members as a result of the improved benefits. This illustrates again how complicated the current pensions taxation regime is and how, in an already complex world, it can add inappropriate and unnecessary levels of extra complexity to schemes delivering benefits due to members.”
        

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.