![]() |
At the end of last week the Government announced its proposals for addressing the issues arising from the transitional arrangements introduced when the public service pension schemes were reformed in 2014 and 2015 – following the McCloud and Sargeant rulings that these changes represented unlawful discrimination. |
The estimated cost of the resulting additional member benefits of nearly £20bn represents broadly an extra 1% being added to the total value of future public service pensions that have been earned to date - and seems to be unavoidable in the circumstances given the background to the changes and the legal rulings that they represent unlawful discrimination. Commenting on the future approach, Bart Huby, Chair of the Association of Consulting Actuaries’ (ACA) Pensions in Public Services Committee, said: “What will be important, whichever approach is used - the Government is consulting on two options - is that the remedy is implemented efficiently and effectively for each public service scheme. In particular, with around 3 million members needing to make a decision on which scheme to be in, it will be vital that affected members are given sufficient information and guidance to properly understand the decisions they are being asked to make and are provided with adequate support in making those decisions. “If this doesn’t happen, there will be a real risk that some members will make what is in retrospect a bad decision, and then subsequently claim they weren’t adequately supported by their scheme – leading potentially to further uncertainty and extra costs.”
Karen Goldschmidt, the Chair of the ACA’s Pensions Taxation Committee added: “It’s also worth noting that the main consultation document contains 8 pages on pensions taxation issues – primarily focusing on how to reverse out the additional tax that might otherwise be payable by members as a result of the improved benefits. This illustrates again how complicated the current pensions taxation regime is and how, in an already complex world, it can add inappropriate and unnecessary levels of extra complexity to schemes delivering benefits due to members.” |
|
|
|
| Lead Personal Lines Analyst | ||
| London / South Coast / hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Strategic Pricing | ||
| London / Hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Pricing Analyst - Personal Lines | ||
| South Coast / hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Business Development in Investment | ||
| London / hybrid (3 dpw office-based) - Negotiable | ||
| Financial Lines Pricing Manager | ||
| London / hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Commercial Lines Pricing | ||
| London / South Coast - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Portfolio Management | ||
| London - £200,000 Per Annum | ||
| Investment Manager (FIA or CFA) | ||
| Flex / hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Actuarial Reporting (Life) | ||
| South East / hybrid 3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| CONTRACT: London Market Capital Actuary | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Portfolio Manager | ||
| Hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Pricing Assurance Manager | ||
| London - £145,000 Per Annum | ||
| Actuarial Director with BD and CatMod... | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Pensions data expert: buy-out/residua... | ||
| Any UK Office location / Hybrid 2dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Portfolio Manager | ||
| London - £150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Pensions Trustee Actuarial Con... | ||
| London / hybrid 3 dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Shape the future of the pensions in... | ||
| UK Flex / hybrid 2dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Challenge the pensions industry! | ||
| UK Flex / hybrid 2dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Actuarial Pricing Manager - Non-life | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Pricing Actuary | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.