![]() |
At the end of last week the Government announced its proposals for addressing the issues arising from the transitional arrangements introduced when the public service pension schemes were reformed in 2014 and 2015 – following the McCloud and Sargeant rulings that these changes represented unlawful discrimination. |
The estimated cost of the resulting additional member benefits of nearly £20bn represents broadly an extra 1% being added to the total value of future public service pensions that have been earned to date - and seems to be unavoidable in the circumstances given the background to the changes and the legal rulings that they represent unlawful discrimination. Commenting on the future approach, Bart Huby, Chair of the Association of Consulting Actuaries’ (ACA) Pensions in Public Services Committee, said: “What will be important, whichever approach is used - the Government is consulting on two options - is that the remedy is implemented efficiently and effectively for each public service scheme. In particular, with around 3 million members needing to make a decision on which scheme to be in, it will be vital that affected members are given sufficient information and guidance to properly understand the decisions they are being asked to make and are provided with adequate support in making those decisions. “If this doesn’t happen, there will be a real risk that some members will make what is in retrospect a bad decision, and then subsequently claim they weren’t adequately supported by their scheme – leading potentially to further uncertainty and extra costs.”
Karen Goldschmidt, the Chair of the ACA’s Pensions Taxation Committee added: “It’s also worth noting that the main consultation document contains 8 pages on pensions taxation issues – primarily focusing on how to reverse out the additional tax that might otherwise be payable by members as a result of the improved benefits. This illustrates again how complicated the current pensions taxation regime is and how, in an already complex world, it can add inappropriate and unnecessary levels of extra complexity to schemes delivering benefits due to members.” |
|
|
|
BPA Implementation Manager | ||
North / hybrid working 50/50 - Negotiable |
Head of Reserving | ||
City of London - £150,000 Per Annum |
PRT or BPA Specialist | ||
Nationwide offices / hybrid working - Negotiable |
Retirement Consultant | ||
UK-wide / hybrid 2 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
GI Associate Actuarial Director | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
GI Actuarial Senior Manager | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Actuarial Manager - GI/Risk | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Insurance Risk Manager | ||
London / hybrid 2-3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Financial Risk Leader - ALM Oversight | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Financial Risk Leader | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Take the lead on actuarial financial ... | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
With-Profits and Investment Risk Expert | ||
Flex / hybrid - Negotiable |
Reinsurance Actuary | ||
London/Hybrid - Negotiable |
CONTRACT (12 months): Underwriter | ||
Fully remote - Negotiable |
CONTRACT (12 months): Senior Underwriter | ||
Fully remote - Negotiable |
MI Manager | ||
UK South West / hybrid 2 days in the office - Negotiable |
Senior MI Analyst | ||
UK South West / hybrid 2 days in the office - Negotiable |
LONDON MARKET CONTRACT: Capital Model... | ||
London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Senior M&A Actuary | ||
London / hybrid 3 dpw office-based - Negotiable |
Market-leading Pricing | ||
South East or Scotland / hybrid 2 dpw in the office - Negotiable |
Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.