General Insurance Article - Reply to IAIS systemic risk pre-consultation


Insurance Europe has published its response to the International Association of Insurance Supervisors' (IAIS) pre-consultation on an activities-based approach (ABA) to systemic risk.

 The response notes that traditional insurance is not systemically risky and systemic risk from individual insurers can only originate from a very limited number of activities undertaken on a large scale in the wrong conditions.
 Insurance Europe said that, while the IAIS' work is at a very early stage and many more aspects need to be clarified, a proportionate and properly-designed ABA could address "domino", as well as "tsunami", views of risk, given the focus on risk management and preventative actions. As such, this would fulfil many of the objectives of the current entity-based approach (EBA). Insurance Europe also said that a holistic ABA should guide the subsequent definition of appropriate policy measures where necessary, with a particular focus on risk management and preventative actions.

 Insurance Europe stressed that the EBA is simply not appropriate for assessing systemic risk in insurance, because this risk should always be determined holistically rather than through the use of the current global systemically important insurers (G-SII) assessment indicators that are biased towards measuring the size of an insurance group.

 In Insurance Europe's view, an assessment of systemic risk should go beyond merely identifying whether activities giving rise to potential vulnerabilities exist, but also consider whether the risk stemming from these activities can actually be transmitted to the wider global financial system, and how this is mitigated in practice. A link to the global financial system through transmission channels should be clearly identified and the level of diversification within the insurance group should be adequately considered.

 Insurance Europe also emphasised that the materiality of the potential systemic risk transmitted to the financial system should be an essential consideration under an ABA. In the assessment of materiality, additional factors which may act as mitigants of systemic risk should be duly considered, to ensure the accuracy of any assessment of an activity's systemic risk potential.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Hurricanes and earthquakes could lead to USD300bn losses
Following the long-term annual growth trend of 5–7%, global insured natural catastrophe losses may reach USD 145 billion in 2025, mainly driven by sec
FCA set to launch live AI testing service
The FCA is seeking views from firms about how its live AI testing service can help them to deploy safe and responsible AI, which will benefit UK consu
Over one third of London market firms now actively using AI
The Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) has hosted a seminar on the use of AI within the London specialty market. The seminar referenced results from a r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.