Pensions - Articles - Royal London favour principle based benefit statement


Royal London has rejected the proposal for a standardised shorter annual benefit statement in favour of a more principles based approach.

 Responding to a government consultation on the issue the mutual insurer said that while it supported the aim to improve customer communications, adopting a standardised, shortened format would lead to important information being left out.
 
 Providing feedback on a sample statement included in the consultation the insurer said information on costs and charges needed to be included as well as the percentage return on the investments. The shorter format also omits key calls to action such as updating beneficiaries and that more needed to be done to signpost members to where they can go for more information.
 
 The shortened format would also mean important information around the Royal London ProfitShare scheme, whereby a share of the company’s profits are added to customer’s pensions would not be included.
 
 The cost of moving to a standardised format was also highlighted with the insurer estimating the costs could run to £3.6m with further costs for legacy customers. In 2017 Royal London comprehensively updated its annual benefit statements in line with customer feedback. The move has been greeted very positively with 95% of customers saying they found the information in the statement easy to understand.
 
 Given that the Pensions Dashboard will soon become the main place people go to see all their pension information it argues against incurring huge costs re-designing paper statements that are already being seen as effective.
 It added that adopting an industry-wide approach would mean that any necessary updates would be done by a “slow ‘by committee’ process and that is unlikely to be one that will include individual changes that will be important to our members.”

 Commenting on the consultation, Isobel Langton, CEO of Royal London Intermediary, said: “While we certainly support the aim to improve how we communicate with customers we feel that taking an industry-wide standardised approach is not the way to go. Shoehorning the statement into two pages means important information on costs, charges and investment growth could be omitted. We also want the flexibility to include important messages such as the value of taking financial advice, our ProfitShare scheme and where to go to get more information. Adopting a more principles-based approach will enable us to do this.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DC Pension Tracker Q3 2025
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker fell over the quarter, with the younger savers seeing decreases in their expected outcomes, while the older members’ exp
Employers must take lead in retirement adequacy crisis
Employers will end up taking most of the responsibility for helping to solve the retirement adequacy problem if we are to see real and impactful chang
Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.