Pensions - Articles - Seven missed opportunities from the Auto Enrolment Review


Kate Smith, Head of Pensions at Aegon highlights what she believes are the missed opportunities from the Auto-enrolment Review.

 The Government has stopped short of making auto-enrolment the social norm for every single UK employee. Those earning less than £10,000 will still need to make an active decision about whether they wish to opt in to their workplace pension scheme and benefit from an employer contribution. Removing the earnings trigger altogether would have treated them like any other employee.
  
 The automatic right to an employer contribution stops as soon as an employee reaches State Pension Age, as they have to opt in. As many people are enjoying longer working lives, this is a missed opportunity to remove the upper age barrier.
  
 Most employers pay more than the April 2018 contribution increases, so the real litmus test for auto enrolment will be in April 2019, when the total rate jumps up to 8%. The government should wait and see how employers and employees react to this before implementing policy changes. But waiting another six years is simply procrastinating. Every year of pension saving counts, it would be a far better to bring forward proposed changes to the early 2020s. This should give employers enough time to plan and budget for increased costs.
  
 If employees opt-out of pension saving, or chose to pay a lower contribution than the statutory minimum, they lose the right to an employer contribution, effectively taking a pay cut. There’s been no mention of making auto enrolment contributions more flexible, while retaining the right to an employer contribution.
  
 Opt-out rates don’t tell the full story. Cessation rates, where employees pay pension contributions then leave their scheme are almost double the 9% opt-out rate at 16%, peaking at one to three months after being auto-enrolled. Too many employees are building up micro pension pots. Simple ways to address this would be to increase the opt-out period to three months, or allow a refund of micro funds, but this could mean that some employees are never able to build up a pension pot. The proposed pension dashboards offer a far better way for employees to keep track of these micro pots, along with the tools and support needed to consolidate them into meaningful pensions.
  
 Although conversations on how to help the self-employed save for retirement using auto enrolment principles will kick start in 2018, a solution seems to be far away for this diverse group. The self-employed can’t afford to be left behind and need to take personal responsibility now for their retirement plans .
  
 And the greatest omission of them all, is a forward looking plan setting out higher auto-enrolment contribution rates. Despite plans to make more earnings pensionable 8%, this still won’t be enough for most employees to build up an adequate retirement income.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.