Pensions - Articles - State pension under scrutiny in benefit uprating debate


There was a benefits uprating debate in the House of Commons. Alison McGovern MP described the current approach to uprating as “farcical” that causes speculation and stress and called for a more standard approach. Nigel Mills MP questioned why the September inflation figure is used for an April benefits uprating. He asked whether using later figures would prevent spikes. He proposed whether using a two- or three-year rolling average could smooth things out.

 The Pensions Minister was questioned over efforts to boost Pension Credit take up as well as the progress of the Auto-enrolment Extension Bill. He said Pension Credit inquiries had grown and that he was pushing hard for progress on the AE Extension Bill.

 Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis, Hargreaves Lansdown: “The triple lock has had a rollercoaster ride, delivering two of its highest increases ever in the past two years, after being controversially suspended during the pandemic. After a period of time when people’s finances have been torn to shreds by the cost-of-living crisis, the MPs were in no mood to oppose the 8.5% increase due to come into effect in April, but there was a sense that change is needed in how benefits are uprated.

 Nigel Mills MP questioned whether the September inflation figure needed to be used for an April uprating, or whether the process could be simplified so that a later figure could be used that would provide a more realistic picture in periods when inflation or wages are moving quickly. He pointed out that using a two- or three-year rolling average might prove more useful in delivering a smoothed figure. Such measures would surely go some way towards containing costs.

 Others pointed to the need for a more standardised approach to bring pensioners much needed certainty around what they get and when. Pensioner poverty was a key part of the debate with the recent Joseph Rowntree Poverty report showing over 2m pensioners are in poverty. Wendy Chamberlain MP added that given so many pensioners continue to go hungry, perhaps the discussion needs to move to how much the state pension needs to be, rather than how much to uprate it by.

 We’ve reached an important point in this debate. The triple lock has boosted state pensions, but the fact remains many pensioners remain in poverty while state pension costs spiral. A review of state pensions, and the triple lock’s role within it, is urgently needed to deliver a system that delivers certainty for pensioners now and in the future.”

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF marks 20 years of protection in its Annual Report
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has published its 2024/25 Annual Report and Accounts, marking its 20th anniversary with a year of strong financial p
DC pensions continue to back Net Zero despite ESG backlash
Barnett Waddingham’s latest DC Sustainability Report finds a 34% increase in allocations to funds with a climate target in the growth stage since orig
Chancellors focus on guided retirement for pensions savers
Ahead of the Mansion House speech to be delivered by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the evening of 15 July, Glyn Bradley, Chair of Pensions Board at t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.