Pensions - Articles - TPR asking trustees to consider cutting of transfer values


A letter being sent to leading Defined Benefit pension schemes encourages trustees to consider cutting the transfer values on offer when workers transfer out of the pension scheme. The letter, obtained in response to a Freedom of Information request by Royal London, has been sent to several large pension schemes who have been experiencing a large volume of transfers, as part of a drive to protect members from unsuitable transfers and from pension scams.

  But the letter also raises concerns that if trustees offer overly generous transfer values to those leaving the scheme this could be to the detriment of those left behind. The key section of the letter says:

 ‘In light of recent events concerning your scheme sponsors, we would expect you to take advice from your scheme actuary about whether the basis on which the CETV [transfer value] are calculated remains appropriate… This would allow you to judge whether a reduction of further reduction should be applied to CETVs in light of [an] assessment of covenant strength’.

 A particular concern appears to be the situation where workers transferring out are offered a cash lump sum on relatively generous terms at a time when the pension scheme itself is in deficit. If large numbers of members transfer out on generous terms there would be a risk that the funding position of the scheme could worsen and the risk of remaining members not getting their full pensions could increase.

 Commenting on the correspondence, Steve Webb, Director of Policy at Royal London said: ‘I would hope that well run pension schemes would be taking expert advice when deciding how much to offer to members wishing to transfer out. But the Regulator’s letter is a helpful reminder to all schemes that they need to be fair not only to those transferring out but also those left behind, especially where the scheme in question is in deficit’.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.