Pensions - Articles - Work and Pensions Committee call to scrap triple lock


Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon said: "The government will no doubt need to review the future of the triple lock beyond the next General Election as it seeks to deliver fair policies between generations.

 Those who are already in retirement have seen their income after housing costs almost catch up with those of working age largely because of generous final salary pension scheme they built up in the past but also helped by recent above inflation increases in the state pension as a result of the triple lock.

 However the Government must not set long term pension policy on the basis of those currently in retirement as those retiring in future are much less likely to match the incomes of current pensioners. The state pension remains the bedrock of many people's income in retirement and pensioners must be given some stability over its future level . We believe any government should commit to state pension increases for its 5 year period in power with intentions set out in pre-election manifestos.” 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF marks 20 years of protection in its Annual Report
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has published its 2024/25 Annual Report and Accounts, marking its 20th anniversary with a year of strong financial p
DC pensions continue to back Net Zero despite ESG backlash
Barnett Waddingham’s latest DC Sustainability Report finds a 34% increase in allocations to funds with a climate target in the growth stage since orig
Chancellors focus on guided retirement for pensions savers
Ahead of the Mansion House speech to be delivered by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the evening of 15 July, Glyn Bradley, Chair of Pensions Board at t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.