Life - Articles - Workplace benefits packages cost a fifth of salary


 Over a third of mid-sized employers say their overall employee benefits package costs more than 20 per cent of salary, according to Towers Watson’s Benefits HealthCheck survey. The results also show that employers with defined benefit (DB) benefits have higher benefit costs than those with only defined contribution (DC) arrangements.

 Peter Routledge, London retirement solutions managing director at Towers Watson said: “This finding raises the question of whether employers that continue to offer DB benefits are fully aware of the implications of this decision and how the associated higher costs affect the ability of the employer to remain competitive. In addition, employers with open DB plans need to ensure the additional costs are offset by increased employee appreciation and engagement.”

 In terms of benefits strategies, around 60 per cent of those surveyed say that they have a consistent philosophy and strategy across their employee benefits and that it is aligned with their business needs. However, more than half do not know how effective their benefits plans are in supporting their business needs in practice. Of the companies that have metrics in place to assess the effectives of their benefits plans, few are confident that they have the right metrics in place.

 Peter Routledge said: “With over half of employers saying they have reviewed one or all of their pension or benefit plans in the last year, it is clear that there is a desire to align benefits with business needs. As such, the ability to measure and monitor how well pension and benefit provision is working will be essential in ensuring that these plans remain fit for the future.”

 The research, which looks at employers with either a DB or DC pension scheme, shows that for those organisations with DC arrangements, improving DC member engagement is high on the agenda.

 Peter Routledge said: “There is still a significant gap in interest between new joiners of DC schemes, often through auto-enrolment, and those really paying attention and taking the necessary actions to maximise the value of future pensions and to safeguard their financial futures. This gap has to narrow quickly if employers are to get the full benefit of their benefits packages.

 “Other top planned actions for the next three years are to review the investment fund choices available to employees, improve governance, and introducing annuity broking. This indicates a clear desire from employers for better outcomes and levels of understanding for their employees in DC schemes.”

 For those organisations with DB plans, de-risking has been, and will continue to be, high on the agenda according to the survey. It also shows that the most common actions taken by companies so far are closures to new entrants and future accrual, while work to diversify pension schemes’ investments has also been common. The survey shows that the most popular company actions for the coming years are likely to focus on ‘second-phase’ de-risking, either via buy-in/buy-out solutions, interest-rate hedging or other liability management exercises.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

World Cancer Day: Only 17% of employers focus on cancer
The very latest research from the employee benefits experts at Everywhen shows that only 17% of employers will be focussing their employee health and
FCA seeks views on how to help close the protection gap
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has called on the insurance industry to help more consumers access products that support them and their families
Expansion of company funded PMI schemes planned
Over one in 10 businesses that don’t currently provide PMI benefits to employees say they definitely plan to introduce PMI in next 3 years, with a fur

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.