Pensions - Articles - Call for withdrawal from the Retail Prices Index

Alistair Russell-Smith, Partner, Hymans Robertson responds to Mark Carney’s call for a “deliberate and carefully timed” withdrawal from the Retail Prices Index (RPI)

 “The impact of a withdrawal from the RPI would have consequences that would reverberate across financial services and not least within the world of defined benefit/final salary pensions. The measure is currently used by many schemes to calculate annual indexation and has been subject to much industry debate. If a withdrawal from the RPI meant schemes could reference CPI rather than RPI for indexation then this would have a very significant impact.

 “In fact, if CPI was adopted by the entire FTSE 350 we expect the resulting liability reduction would be £100 billion. Our most recent estimate of DB pension deficits within this group stands at £85 billion, meaning that such a move would actually place the FTSE350 into surplus. However, this would materially reduce member benefits, on average by around £20,000 over a member’s lifetime.

 “The closure or collapse of DB pension schemes in the FTSE 350 and in the UK as a whole has, rightly, been the subject of much analysis and consideration in recent weeks. Our research shows that pension scheme deficits continue to be manageable for around 85% of the FTSE 350 as they could pay off their deficits by using less than 6 months’ of earnings. It is therefore questionable if a wholesale move to CPI is necessary for most schemes. However, this would end the current rules lottery, and be extremely valuable for the minority of employers where the pension scheme is very significant.”

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

Alexa ask Aviva what is the value of my pension
Aviva has created a new pension skill for Amazon Alexa which allows customers to find out how much they have saved towards their retirement.
Majority would prefer monthly income from protection policy
A recent Aegon survey* found that 58% of people would prefer insurance that pays a monthly income rather than a lump sum. Recognising this preference,
ACA response to consultation on stronger powers for TPR
In its response to the consultation on stronger powers for the Pensions Regulator, the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA), whilst expressing ‘s

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.