Pensions - Articles - DB pensions liabilities increase by GBP55bn in eight weeks

New analysis from Buck has revealed that the value of aggregate funding liabilities for UK Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes (around £1.9 trillion covering around 5,400 schemes) have increased by approximately £55bn over the last eight weeks. The analysis shows that this sudden rise in liability values has been driven purely by recent falls in government bond yields, or gilt yields, of over 25 basis points during the same period.

 With long-dated gilts serving as a market indicator for the ‘risk-free’ rate of return for pension schemes, gilt yields are used by the vast majority of schemes to value current and future pension liabilities, meaning a fall in yields has led to the large increase in the value placed on pension scheme liabilities.
 As such, Buck is calling for trustees and their advisers to consider the impact of falling gilt yields on their pension schemes and liabilities. For example, schemes without a robust hedging strategy in place, such as a liability-driven investment strategy, are likely to be facing significantly weaker funding positions due to the drop in yields at a time when many trustees are also facing increased liabilities from GMP equalisation and Brexit uncertainty.
 In addition, pension schemes with contingent funding arrangements may need to determine if those arrangements have been triggered, whilst for others the volatile market movements may highlight the need to put a strong Integrated Risk Management framework in place.
 Vishal Makkar, Head of Retirement Consulting at Buck in the UK comments: “With gilt yields dropping to a two-year low, we’ve seen a substantial impact on the value of funding liabilities of DB pension schemes across the UK, particularly in the last couple of months. No doubt, the recent market volatility will result in calls from some quarters for the pensions industry to re-evaluate the validity of the long used ‘gilts plus margin’ approach to setting discount rates and valuing pension liabilities. It will be interesting to see how this issue is addressed in the Regulator’s new funding code expected towards the end of this year.
 However, the reality is most pension schemes set their valuation discount rate using gilt yields, so it’s vital for trustees and sponsors to respond quickly to these new market conditions.
 “Of course, the best course of action will depend on each scheme’s unique funding position and investment strategy. Those schemes that have hedged their liabilities would have seen their assets increase to offset the impact of increasing liabilities. In other cases, trustees should be considering whether to implement their contingency plans as per The Pensions Regulator’s guidance. Where the sponsor covenant is particularly weak and the scheme has a high Value at Risk, trustees may even need to consider bringing forward their next actuarial valuation.”

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

Hymans Robertson comment on GMP Equalisation call to action
Commenting on the GMP Equalisation Working Group’s initial guidance for good practice in GMP equalisation, Matt Davis, Head of GMP Equalisation at Hym
DC master trusts most appropriate employer pension scheme
New research from Buck has revealed that master trusts are the most suitable defined contribution (DC) pension scheme for nearly 60% of UK employers.
PASA publishes GMP Equalisation call to action
The cross industry GMP Equalisation Working Group (GMPEWG), launched in January, today publishes their ‘Call to Action’. The GMPEWG is chaired by the

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.