Pensions - Articles - Scam pension schemes took GBP 13.7m from victims


Four people who ran a series of scam pension schemes have been ordered to pay back £13.7 million they took from their victims. David Austin, Susan Dalton, Alan Barratt and Julian Hanson squandered the money after 245 members of the public were persuaded via cold-calling and similar techniques to transfer their pension savings into one of 11 scam schemes operated by Friendly Pensions Limited (FPL).

 Victims were told that if they transferred their pension pots to the schemes they would receive a tax-free payment commonly described as a “commission rebate” from investments made by the pension scheme – a form of pension scam.

 Today (23 January) the High Court ruled that Austin, Dalton, Barratt and Hanson should repay millions of pounds they took from the schemes over a two-year period.

 The Pensions Regulator (TPR) had asked the High Court to order the defendants to repay the funds they dishonestly misused or misappropriated from the pension schemes – the first time such an order has been obtained.

 Austin laundered funds from the schemes into his bank account and the accounts of family members in the UK, Switzerland and Andorra through a number of businesses that he had set up in the UK, Cyprus and the Caribbean, including FPL. TPR showed the High Court evidence of how members of Austin’s family had lived a life of luxury using the money – including showing off their spending on expensive goods, ski holidays and trips to Dubai and the Mediterranean on social media sites.

 Dalriada, the independent trustee appointed by TPR to take over the running of the schemes, will now be able to seek the confiscation of the scammers’ assets for the benefit of their victims.

 Nicola Parish, TPR’s Executive Director of Frontline Regulation, said: “The defendants siphoned off millions of pounds from the schemes on what they falsely claimed were fees and commissions.

 “While Austin was the mastermind, they all took part in stripping the schemes almost bare. This left hardly anything behind from the savings their victims had set aside over decades of work to pay for their retirements.

 “The High Court’s ruling means that Dalriada can now go after the assets and investments of those involved to try to recover at least some of the money that these corrupt people took. This case sends a clear message that we will take tough action against pension scammers.”

 In his judgment, Judge Mark Pelling ruled that Austin had been the “mastermind” behind the scam and that all four of the defendants had acted dishonestly.

 He ruled that Mr Austin and Mr Barratt were jointly and severally liable to pay £7,713,317.71 plus interest, that Mr Austin and Ms Dalton were jointly and severally liable for £5,900,947 plus interest and that Mr Austin and Mr Hanson were jointly and severally liable to pay £122,937.37 plus interest. The judge also ordered that they pay the costs of TPR and Dalriada on an indemnity basis.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Gen Z urged to stick with pension saving
Starting pension contributions aged 22 could mean £40,000 more in retirement than starting aged 27. Those who wait even longer, starting at 32, could
Rising costs of TPS and STPS burdening independent schools
Over 400 independent schools have left the Teacher’s Pension Scheme (TPS) since 20191. TPS cost increases make it less financially viable. Independent
Government and Regulator give schemes impetus on endgame
Building on LCP’s new Accounting for Pensions 2025 report that was released last month, the latest results by LCP’s Pensions Explorer at 31 May 2025 s

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.