General Insurance Article - Significant flaws in EIOPA Solvency II risk margin formula


Willis Towers Watson has responded to a European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Discussion Paper on the upcoming review of Solvency II, where it has identified significant flaws in the formula used to calculate the risk margin and recommended a fundamental review of its methodology and calibration.

 Kamran Foroughi, Director at Willis Towers Watson, said: “We believe the high level of risk margin currently attached to long-term insurance products is resulting in higher premium rates and reduced competition, leading to worse value for consumers.”

 Willis Towers Watson’s submission notes that the risk margin has become a much more material component of insurers’ balance sheets, leading to a number of challenges and changes in business practice, including:
 • Asset Liability Matching. Insurers’ ALM challenges related to risk margin have been exacerbated by falling interest rates.
 • Risk transfer. The bigger the risk margin relative to the rest of the technical provisions, the more insurers are incentivised     to offload risk to reduce the risk margin. This can be done via reinsurance to a company outside the EU which is not           bound by Solvency II rules.
 • Longevity reinsurance. We believe that the growth in the longevity reinsurance market has been caused primarily because   the Solvency II risk margin is materially too large for relevant primary insurance business (mainly immediate annuities).

 The consultancy’s submission, principally focused on the risk margin, recommends an independent review of the purpose of the risk margin and what an appropriate methodology and calibration should be.

 “The Solvency II Draft Directive was published in July 2007 and defined the risk margin to be part of the technical provisions and calibrated as a 6% per annum capital charge on non-hedgeable risks,” said Kamran Foroughi. “Throughout the rest of the Solvency II project up to adoption on 1 January 2016, there seems to have been no mechanism available to revisit this definition.”

 Kamran Foroughi said: “After a fundamental review to confirm the broad model for the risk margin, stress and scenario testing should then be used to determine whether it should also change in different markets. If a risk margin model were to be permitted that varies with market movements, we would advocate an anti-cyclical approach as opposed to the current approach which we believe ends up being dangerously pro-cyclical.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The role of insurance in disaster resilience must expand
Shaun Tarbuck, Chief Executive of the International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation (ICMIF) addressed the Risk Transfer and Insurance for
Employers urged to use Group Risk as cancer stats released
Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD said: “Cancer continues to be the number one** cause of claim under all three Group Risk products (employer-sp
Octo Telematics hit Five Million connected cars worldwide
Octo Telematics (Octo) with 39% of the market in terms of active usage-based insurance (UBI) policies, said today that five million cars are now conne

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.