Pensions - Articles - Changing SPA does not tackle concerns on retirement adequacy


The SPP has responded to the government’s latest review of the State Pension Age (SPA), highlighting that if wider terms of reference, including the purpose of the State Pension, had been provided, “…this would have enabled more relevant factors to be considered and potentially better outcomes”.

 The SPP response further explains that, “changing the SPA addresses the affordability of the State Pension but does not tackle wider concerns about retirement adequacy, the savings gap, or broader questions of fairness.”
 
 The SPP goes on to state that whilst the SPA is a key determinant of the cost of the State Pension, relying solely on this lever would imply the SPA increasing to 75 or beyond in the coming decades, which “…would present significant political and social difficulties and would fundamentally alter retirement expectations.” The SPP suggest that a more practical role for the SPA would instead be as part of a balanced package of reforms.
 
 In relation to the idea of an automatic adjustment mechanism (AAM), SPP recognises this would provide for the “predictable and automatic implementation of any necessary changes to the SPA without having to seek political consent” but they warn, “…its existence does not eliminate political risk since there will inevitably be pressure to cancel or adjust the automatic change from affected groups.”
 
 Finally, the SPP suggests that policymakers should consider the issue of “fairness” when considering the factors driving changes to the SPA, particularly when different factors multiply the impact within a single group, stating, “…there will be groups which leave the labour market earlier than average, have a lower life expectancy and a lower healthy life expectancy. By almost any measure of fairness they would lose out.”
 
 Shayala McRae, Chair of the SPP Legislation Committee, said: “Reviewing the State Pension Age may appear to be a relatively straightforward decision but in truth it is a complex challenge that has far reaching implications for British society – political, social and of course, economic. Although the SPP believes the terms of reference for this review were unnecessarily narrow, we have sought to highlight a range of issues for consideration that we trust prove useful in helping the government to reach the best possible decision.”
  

 Government review of State Pension Age consultation

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

CDC promises much for employees and employers
Commenting on the Government’s CDC consultation response, Jon Hatchett, Senior Partner, Hymans Robertson
National Pension Tracing Day with millions losing out
PensionBee is urging savers to take a few minutes this National Pension Tracing Day (Sunday, 26 October 2025) to check whether they may be missing a p
The DC Future Book 2025
This year marks the eleventh edition of the Pensions Policy Institute’s DC Future Book. In keeping with the evolving pensions landscape, this edition

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.