Pensions - Articles - Cost of pension buyouts set to rise by 10%, according to PwC


Companies and pension scheme trustees who want to transfer their defined benefit (DB) pension liabilities to insurers should try to complete their deals soon or could expect to pay up to 10% more from next year due to a new regulatory regime for insurers, according to PwC’s pensions advisory team.

 Solvency II will require insurers to hold more capital to support buyout business written from January 2016. PwC predicts this could drive a surge of activity in the buyout market in the coming weeks, as pension schemes rush to complete deals this year before the price hikes. 
  
 Around £13bn worth of DB pension liabilities were passed to insurance companies in 2014 and a further £5bn to date in 2015, as companies seek to remove these unpredictable and long-term liabilities from their balance sheets.
  
 The expected price hike will affect pension schemes with pre-retirement members (so called full buyouts), the most. Deals which only involve members that have already retired are less affected by the new Solvency II regime, where pricing has benefited from more insurers now operating in this market.
  
 Jerome Melcer, PwC pensions director and buyout adviser, said:
 “Any companies considering a pensions buyout in the next few years should buy now or could end up paying later, due to the price hikes Solvency II will bring.
  
 “Companies or trustees looking at the business case for buyout will need early, reliable price visibility before pressing the button on buyout. This is where real-time information, such as PwC’s unique Skyval Insure service, can add real value, by sourcing direct pricing from all of the insurers operating in the buyout market within a week of a request. Pension trustee boards and financial directors will find this refreshingly cost efficient compared to traditional processes which otherwise take months.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR publish first AFS under the new DB funding code
TPR’s first AFS published under the new DB funding code sets expectations for focus on endgame planning. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) expects most sch
Comments on The Pensions Regulators annual funding statement
Initial Comments on The Pensions Regulators Annual Funding statement from Standard Life, PMI, ACA, Broadstone and XPS Group
Further responses to TPRs AFS publication
Hymans Robertson, Barnett Waddingham and The Society Pension professionals of comment on The Pension Regulator’s 2025 annual funding statement publish

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.