Pensions - Articles - Couples neglecting retirement conversations


 One in five (19 per cent) couples over the age of 40 have avoided discussing their retirement plans in the last five years while one in 10 (11 per cent) have never discussed it, according to new research from Prudential.

 Infographic

 The lack of retirement conversations extends to having professional financial advice together. Only one in 10 couples over the age of 40 have seen a financial adviser jointly in the past five years to discuss their retirement plans, while 14 per cent admit that they or their partner have seen a financial adviser alone to discuss retirement planning.

 The research results also show that avoiding discussions around retirement can lead to a mismatch in how much money each half of a couple expects to live on in retirement. When asked separately to estimate the couple’s expected joint retirement income, men said £35,100 on average and women £32,000.

 It’s also not just retirement planning that couples avoid discussing – Prudential’s research found that they avoid discussing their finances in general. Six per cent of couples admit they have never discussed their finances together and a further 12 per cent have not discussed money for over a year.

 Despite sharing a life together, many couples are also reluctant to lay their financial cards on the table at all. Around 25 per cent keep their current accounts entirely separate, 30 per cent hold savings in separate accounts and 23 per cent maintain separate investments.

 This behaviour could be partly as a result of fears that financial conversations will spark arguments. Money is the third most likely subject to cause disagreement among couples, with almost a quarter (23 per cent) admitting they fight more about finances than they do about socialising (13 per cent), work (10 per cent), or politics and religion (7 per cent). Family issues (33 per cent) and household chores (27 per cent) top the most likely arguments list.

 Vince Smith-Hughes, retirement expert at Prudential, said:

 “For any couple, discussing and agreeing on the best retirement income options for them is as important as keeping their day-to-day finances in order. A joint conversation with a financial adviser or retirement specialist could be an important step in ensuring that the right pension-saving decisions are made, so that both partners can enjoy a comfortable retirement. There is also plenty of free information available from independent organisations such as the Money Advice Service.

 “It’s easy for couples to put off conversations about finances, particularly longer-term issues like retirement planning, because it’s difficult to see any short-term impact. But our research has highlighted some worrying trends, in particular the fact that nearly one in five couples approaching retirement, in the 45 to 54 age group, have never discussed jointly their plans for income in later life.

 Avoiding the conversation is just likely to create a bigger issue in the longer term, so having open, frequent and early conversations about retirement planning really can help couples to remain financially secure.”    

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Pension and savings review needed from incoming government
A recent survey by PensionBee, highlights a strong desire (87%) among consumers for the incoming government to conduct a comprehensive review of the p
Common vision between DB Sponsors and Trustees is vital
DB Trustees and sponsors must share a common vision when considering run-on says Hymans Robertson, as its latest update to the Excellence in Endgame i
DC schemes urged to review compliance
Errors in DC scheme contributions, such as incorrect contribution percentages and the incorrect application of tax relief, are becoming increasingly c

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.