General Insurance Article - Dashcams cannot replace cops in cars


More cops in cars are needed to reduce crime and deter uninsured drivers, according to the AA president in a letter to coincide with the Police Federation conference.

 Whilst the government’s funding boost for police to use video evidence as part of a two-year road safety action plan is welcome, it can’t be an excuse to cut police officer numbers.
 
 King has written to the Police Federation to say that technology has a role to play with cameras and dashcams but that traditional roads policing will still be paramount.
 
 Up to two thirds of cars in the UK are likely to be equipped with dashcams over coming months with a fifth (20%) of drivers already owning one while another half (51%) thinking about doing so, 16% seriously, according to an AA-Populus study.*
 
 Drivers have often found difficulty in submitting dash-cam evidence of poor or dangerous driving to local police forces although in 2016, North Wales Police launched its ‘Operation Snap’ dashcam video portal to accept such evidence. The scheme has seen a large number of fixed penalty notices, retraining courses and prosecutions take place as a direct result of this evidence and it has now been extended to cover the whole of Wales.
 
 The chief reason for dashcam ownership is concern about establishing liability in the event of a crash (60%), or to protect against cash-for-cash fraudsters (25).
 
 Edmund King, AA president, said: “Previous Home Office research showed that the most serious motoring offenders were far more likely to be involved in mainstream crime. Hence, traffic police have a crucial role in making the roads safer and solving broader crimes. Peter Sutcliffe, dubbed the Yorkshire Ripper, was caught by an officer carrying out traffic duties.
 
 “ Camera technology in the form of speed cameras or indeed dashcams can help reduce or clear up crimes but not at the expense of traffic cops.
 
 “ Data is king in the event of a collision and dashcam footage provides proper, reliable evidence that can establish fault. Based on the Operation Snap evidence it does lead to prosecution of dangerous drivers.
 
 “However dashcams and speed cameras don’t deter uninsured drivers or mainstream criminals so there is still a vital road for cops in cars using automatic number plate recognition.”
 
 Reasons for buying a dashcam (AA Populus poll of 21,341)
 ‘To use as evidence to prove fault in a possible collision’ is the overwhelming reason why people have bought one:
 • 60% overall (60% men; 68% women); with similar results across all age groups and regions
 • West Midlands drivers are most likely to be concerned about possible ‘cash for crash’ fraud attempts (29%) compared with 25% overall.
 • Women are also slightly more concerned about potential ‘cash for crash’ attempts (26% saying this compared with 25% of men).
 Other reasons for buying a dashcam include:
 • Reduce my insurance premiums (5%);
 • ‘because I like gadgets’ (1%);
 • to record possible thieves or collisions while parked (3%)
 • to record bad behaviour of other drivers and publish online (2%)
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Hurricanes and earthquakes could lead to USD300bn losses
Following the long-term annual growth trend of 5–7%, global insured natural catastrophe losses may reach USD 145 billion in 2025, mainly driven by sec
FCA set to launch live AI testing service
The FCA is seeking views from firms about how its live AI testing service can help them to deploy safe and responsible AI, which will benefit UK consu
Over one third of London market firms now actively using AI
The Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) has hosted a seminar on the use of AI within the London specialty market. The seminar referenced results from a r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.