Pensions - Articles - DC investors need to be confident in master trusts


Following the publication of TPR’s blog on master trust authorisation extensions, Andy Parker, Associate at Barnett Waddingham, believes DC investors need to be confident in master trusts.

 Asking for extensions seems to be a popular past-time at present! But, on a more serious note, authorisation submissions are exceedingly complex and evidently need much care and attention. If that means some master trusts need more time, then so be it – rather a successful submission than a master trust failing on a technicality due to a rushed response.

 Spreading out the submissions will surely give TPR an even better chance to turn the applications around, with the patiently waiting market ready to start work on a new round of DC design and delivery. We need DC investors to be confident in master trusts, although we would prefer not to have to wait longer to know who will and who will not be authorised.

 Having a broad, competitive master trust market in the medium to long term is of greater importance though than a short term delay in having all the answers.
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

From Payslip to Pension
The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) is delighted to announce the launch of the fourth report in the From Payslip to Pension: Life Course Impacts on Re
Pensions Commission findings buck received wisdom of success
The Pensions Commission has today published its interim report on the state of retirement saving in the UK, setting out the key challenges facing the
Hard Rain: Building climate resilience before the storm
Pension Insurance Corporation plc ('PIC'), has warned that parts of England could risk becoming unviable for future infrastructure and housi

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.