Pensions - Articles - DC investors need to be confident in master trusts


Following the publication of TPR’s blog on master trust authorisation extensions, Andy Parker, Associate at Barnett Waddingham, believes DC investors need to be confident in master trusts.

 Asking for extensions seems to be a popular past-time at present! But, on a more serious note, authorisation submissions are exceedingly complex and evidently need much care and attention. If that means some master trusts need more time, then so be it – rather a successful submission than a master trust failing on a technicality due to a rushed response.

 Spreading out the submissions will surely give TPR an even better chance to turn the applications around, with the patiently waiting market ready to start work on a new round of DC design and delivery. We need DC investors to be confident in master trusts, although we would prefer not to have to wait longer to know who will and who will not be authorised.

 Having a broad, competitive master trust market in the medium to long term is of greater importance though than a short term delay in having all the answers.
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF confirms zero levy for 2026/27
PPF confirms it won’t charge conventional DB schemes a PPF levy next year. Proportionate risk-based ACS levy will be maintained; PPF will work with in
Call for stability ahead of Spring Statement
Ahead of the Spring Statement, PensionBee is warning that further adjustments to pension policy would only add to saver uncertainty, urging the Govern
Pension Credit applications down by 36 percent
New research on Pension Credit journeys conducted by the DWP shows that beyond high-level understanding of what Pension Credit was and who it was for,

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.