General Insurance Article - IPT continues to rise so is it time for a rethink


HRMC data shows that Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) has collected £4.54 billion through the first half of the Financial Year (2025/26). It marks an increase of £39 million on the same period through the previous Financial Year (£4.50 billion in 2024/25) which went on to collect an all-time high tax take of £8.88 billion.

 Cara Spinks, Head of Life and Health at Broadstone: “As the UK faces rising economic inactivity due to ill-health and increasing pressure on the NHS, the role of private health insurance – particularly through the products that mutuals provide – has never been more vital. Yet Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) continues to act as a barrier for access to health insurance products, undermining both public health goals and the government’s ambition to double the size of the mutual sector.

 The hidden cost of protecting the public’s health
 “IPT currently stands at 12% for most health insurance products, including Private Medical Insurance (PMI) and Health Cash Plans. This tax is embedded within premiums, making policies less affordable for individuals and employers alike. According to previous analysis of the mutual and not-for-profit sector performed by Broadstone, IPT added £98 million in costs to policyholders in 2022 alone and this figure will have risen in the period since. If IPT were to be abolished, uptake of these types of policy is likely to increase due to improved affordability. A 20% increase in policy uptake could potentially unlock an additional £65 million in benefits annually to the state even after accounting for lost tax revenue.
  
 A strategic opportunity for the Treasury
 “Far from being a fiscal loss, removing IPT on health insurance could be a strategic investment. A targeted tax cut would help individuals access treatment faster, reduce the NHS burden, and boost workforce productivity which would ultimately offset any tax loss through economic gains.
  
 Supporting mutuals and the government’s growth agenda
 “Mutual insurers play a unique role in complementing the NHS and the welfare state. Their not-for-profit structure allows them to reinvest in member benefits and community health. However, while general insurers and large providers can leverage economies of scale across central costs, IPT disproportionately impacts smaller mutuals. Removing IPT would empower mutuals to expand their reach, innovate their offerings, and contribute meaningfully to the government’s goal of doubling the mutual sector.
  
 A call to action
 “Abolishing IPT on health insurance is not just a tax reform; it’s a public health intervention, a productivity booster, and a mutual sector enabler. It’s time for policymakers to recognise that taxing health is taxing growth – and to act accordingly.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Nearly £200 million paid in cyber claims last year
The ABI has called for cyber insurance to become a part of every organisation’s modern risk management strategy, as its latest figures show £197 milli
Extend salary sacrifice to lower paid staff
Andrew Timpson, employment tax partner at RSM UK explains why the Autumn Budget presents the ideal opportunity to extend salary sacrifice to lower pai
No room for AI when it comes to DIY
Biggest DIY disaster claim cost more than £14,600 after homeowner drilled through water pipe. Artificial Intelligence has got work to do if it’s going

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.