Pensions - Articles - James Atherton Comments on PPF 2012/13 Draft


 "Hidden in the small print of the PPF's consultation is a proposal that could have significant implications for sponsors of pension schemes. The PPF is proposing changes to the way that guarantees to schemes, which many organisations use to significantly reduce their PPF levy payment, will be allowed for. In future, the scheme will have to certify that a company providing such guarantees would be able to afford to pay the full amount should it be called upon.
 This proposal seems certain to put additional costs on employers. Professional advice may well be required in order to provide the necessary certification. If certification is not, or cannot be given, the levy could materially increase. Our view is that organisations that have provided such guarantees in the past should review their arrangements at an early stage to ensure they will continue to be effective in reducing the levy."

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Rising SPA over 60s report going without essentials
New research shows one in seven (14%) people just below State Pension age have gone without food, clothing or heating in the last year, compared to on
Member experience crucial as schemes approach endgame
DB pension schemes could risk poorer member outcomes and engagement if they fail to offer a high-quality member experience as they approach endgame, w
Comments as deferred DC membership surpasses 23 million
Broadstone and Lumera comment on new data from the ONS’ Financial Survey of Pension Schemes highlights how the UK Defined Contribution (DC) pensions s

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.