![]() |
![]() TPR dashboards lead Lucy Stone emphasises that connection is just the start of the dashboards journey, urging schemes to keep up the momentum, focus on value data and embrace the opportunities to learn from user testing. We are edging ever closer to people being able to see all their pensions online at a time of their choosing, revolutionising how they plan for retirement. With the deadline for connection less than six months away, three quarters of all records are now connected to the central digital architecture being built by the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS). |
By Lucy Stone, Pensions Dashboard - Business Lead, TPR But connection is just the beginning. Once a scheme is connected it must be able to find dashboard users in its records and return recent and accurate information to them about the value of their pensions. In August 2025, we started reaching out to the largest occupational pension schemes to assess their data preparations. Together, they cover over 80% of all occupational pension records in scope. These schemes demonstrated a strong focus on data, and we identified many examples of good practice, though there remains some inconsistency in approach and progress. Today we publish a report into the findings of this engagement. This highlights that: Most large schemes are already connected and have increased their focus on data. Personal data work is ongoing – many schemes are still improving the quality of the data used to identify dashboard users, putting in place processes to resolve ‘possible’ matches (where a dashboard user may be a member but this needs confirming), and processes to review and refine their matching criteria. Value data preparations lag behind personal data, with significant work still required to ensure information sent to members is accurate, up-to-date and dashboard-ready. Data quality controls exist but must mature, with schemes needing to embed data improvement, monitoring and assurance into business-as-usual activity rather than treating it as a one-off exercise. High-quality data underpins good member outcomes, not just dashboard compliance – it is fundamental to running a scheme well. We have also updated our dashboards guidance. The changes highlight good practice, the progress made by MaPS on the digital architecture and provide clarity on areas we often asked about. We now provide two checklists to help schemes prepare for dashboards: one for schemes which are still working to connect, and one for schemes which are already connected. Focus on value not just matching
There has been good progress on preparation for matching dashboard users with their pensions. However, we urge all schemes in scope to think value, not just matching. They need to be able to provide accurate information within set timeframes to members on the value of their pensions. This means testing the accuracy of the data items needed to calculate values and ensure calculations are working properly.
For many large schemes, preparation was less advanced on value data than personal data. Only a few schemes had received a specific value readiness report from their providers. Many schemes do not hold recent data for members who don’t receive annual statements and are working to revalue these so they can then focus on a small number of complex cases that will need to be calculated ‘on demand’ (when that member uses a dashboard). Schemes will need to make sure they agree with their administrators the processes for calculating values on demand within the statutory timescales. Defined benefit (DB) and hybrid schemes are most likely to have out of date value data, so next month we will reach out to a sample of these schemes to understand how they are preparing value data. Learn from user testing
Another focus for schemes should be to learn from user testing. MaPS began testing the MoneyHelper dashboard with participants from industry and a small number of consumers. Testing is now ramping up, with thousands of consumers a month soon to be testing the dashboard.
Early feedback has been positive, but testing is also throwing up issues which MaPS, working with industry, can resolve. These range from technical problems which means sometimes data isn’t flowing through from schemes to the dashboard as it should, to dashboards users being unsure of how to interpret the information they are shown. This testing phase is important to make sure dashboards can fulfil their potential in helping people to plan and save for retirement. But for schemes, this phase is also an opportunity to test data and operations in a live environment with real users, but at lower volumes. Schemes can use testing to understand: are there technical issues to be resolved
are the reports schemes are getting from administrators and connection providers helpful
are their matching criteria fit for purpose
are they able to address queries which come in
MaPS will continue to share insights from user testing through their website and newsletters, and we encourage schemes to keep up to date with these. Staying on track
Schemes should be getting regular reports from their administrator(s), AVC providers and dashboard connection providers on progress made in implementing dashboards connection and meeting data duties. We expect trustees and scheme managers to work with their providers to resolve any issues identified.
If schemes aren’t connected by 31 October 2026, they can expect to hear from us. Where we see wilful or reckless non-compliance, we will take a robust enforcement approach. We call on schemes to keep up the good work. The public are counting on you to help them plan and save for a secure retirement. |
|
|
|
| Senior Reserving Actuary | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Capital | ||
| London/Hybrid - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Pricing | ||
| London - £170,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Actuary | ||
| London - £120,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Transformation Lead | ||
| London - £85,000 Per Annum | ||
| Head of Capital | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Portfolio Actuary | ||
| London - £140,000 Per Annum | ||
| Deputy Head of Capital | ||
| London - £140,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Pricing & Portfolio Management... | ||
| London - £150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Transformation Lead | ||
| London - £85,000 Per Annum | ||
| Lead Capital Actuary | ||
| London - £150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Take the lead on capital oversight | ||
| London / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Be at the forefront of creative GI co... | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Remote Market and Credit Risk Calibra... | ||
| Remote - Negotiable | ||
| Contact us about a Capital Contract i... | ||
| London / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Insurance Risk | ||
| London - £160,000 Per Annum | ||
| Director - Pensions Risk Transfer (PRT) | ||
| London, Midlands, North West - hybrid working 2dpw in the office - Negotiable | ||
| Dip a toe into public sector work wit... | ||
| Flex / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| P&C Consultant | ||
| London / hybrid 3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Take the lead client-facing projects ... | ||
| Various locations - Negotiable | ||
Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.