Pensions - Articles - Reforms vital to guard pensions in divorce and cohabitation


The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has submitted its response to the Ministry of Justice consultation, “A fairer end to relationships”, calling for the modernisation of how pension assets are treated on the breakdown of marriages and cohabiting relationships.

Pensions often represent a household's largest or second-largest asset, yet historically they have been overlooked or undervalued compared to immediate needs like housing. The SPP recommends codifying the distinction between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property, placing pension needs on an equal statutory footing in financial remedy decisions, and extending pension sharing orders to qualifying cohabitants.
 
Key recommendations from the SPP’s consultation response include:
 
Leveraging Pensions Dashboards
The SPP calls for verified Pension Dashboard records to become a standard part of court disclosure. In time, secure court access to dashboard data should be enabled to eliminate "lost" pension pots, speed up proceedings, and ensure full transparency.
 
Extending rights to cohabitants
The SPP supports introducing pension sharing orders for qualifying cohabitants and extending eligibility for dependants’ pensions to cohabitants automatically, removing onerous proof-of-dependency hurdles.
 
Objective criteria & lead time
To ensure smooth implementation, the SPP urges policymakers to establish clear, objective legal definitions for "qualifying cohabitants" especially given the upcoming 2027 Inheritance Tax changes relating to unused pensions, and to allow sufficient lead-in time for pension schemes to update processes and handle increased demand.
 
Oliver Topping, Chair of the SPP’s Legislation Committee, said: "Pensions are fundamentally long-term assets designed to provide security in retirement, yet they are too often overlooked during relationship breakdowns. This is frequently to the detriment of the financially weaker party who may have taken career breaks for caregiving.
 
Pension needs should be given equal prominence in family law and vital protections such as pension sharing should be extended to cohabiting couples.
 
Harnessing the new Pensions Dashboards programme for court disclosure would be a game-changer in ensuring full transparency.
 
However, to make these reforms workable in practice, policymakers must provide clear, objective criteria for defining qualifying cohabitants and allow the pensions industry sufficient lead-in time to adapt."
 
 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Retirement adequacy increasingly a business planning risk
Employers risk being caught out by rising costs and workforce planning challenges if they fail to address retirement adequacy, warns Hymans Robertson.
Reforms vital to guard pensions in divorce and cohabitation
The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has submitted its response to the Ministry of Justice consultation, “A fairer end to relationships”, callin
Two thirds expect to rely on the state pension in retirement
Two thirds of people admit they will rely on the state pension ‘to some extent’ in retirement. Almost one-in ten say they will be totally dependent on

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.