Susannah Streeter, Chief Investment Strategist at Wealth Club: “Bond markets are staying wary despite signs the Burnham administration will take bold steps to rethink government spending priorities by axing the triple lock for the State pension. There remains nervousness about the scale of the government's ambitions, when it has so little wriggle room. 10-year gilt yields dropped back very slightly, as rumours swirled about the move to scrap the mechanism to help fund the creaking social care system, but investors are also digesting the government's willingness to remove the ban on public ownership of water companies, which could pave the way for a raft of renationalisations. Although the Prime Minister does appear to have pulled off the trick of not unnerving markets further, he still faces an uphill battle to keep bond investors on side, especially at a time when the energy crisis risks causing inflationary pressures to pop up across the board. Why could this make retirement planning more difficult? The scrapping of the triple lock does raise big questions for people still building their pension pots. If future State Pension increases are no longer guaranteed to keep pace with earnings, people approaching retirement could find that the income they receive from the State makes up a smaller proportion of their previous salary. The goalposts have kept moving, with the age of drawing a pension having crept higher in recent years and set to increase again to 68 by 2046. These incremental changes don't mean that people should suddenly assume the State Pension is going to disappear. But they do indicate that savers may need to think much more carefully about how much retirement income they need to generate themselves.
Mark Futcher, Head of DC Pensions at Howden Employee Benefits, said: “Adjusting the triple lock is a two edged sword. On the face of it, the measure may generate significant savings for the government, but it would also have clear consequences for pensions adequacy too. A clear plan to fund social care is long overdue, but if the net impact for those relying on the state pension is negative, this will be a zero sum game. And, if there are long periods where earnings outstrip the ‘double-lock’, workplace and private pensions will have to carry more of the burden. Social care and pension policy are intertwined. Weakening financial resilience in retirement risks increasing pressure elsewhere, so these decisions must be made as part of a coherent, long-term strategy rather than viewed separately. This is why the work of the Pensions Commission is so important. Any change to the state pension must be accompanied by credible measures to improve pension adequacy and help people build sufficient savings for later life.”
Patrick Thomson, head of research analysis and policy at Standard Life Centre for the Future of Retirement:: “The triple lock has been successful in lifting pensioner incomes and has been an important contributor to improvements in pensioner living standards over the last 15 years. However, there are growing questions around its long-term affordability and how best to balance support for today’s pensioners with the interests of future generations. The move announced today will reduce public spending, but the Government will need to keep a close eye on pensioner living standards, particularly for those most reliant on the State Pension. Whatever decisions are made about how the State Pension is uprated, it is important to maintain confidence in it as the foundation of most people’s retirement income. Many people were already uncertain about the future of the triple lock, with our Retirement Voice 2026 research finding that just 23% of 18 to 65-year-olds believed it would still exist by the time they retire, down from 29% in 2025. This comes at a critical time for Gen X, with many approaching retirement facing pension undersaving challenges, compounded by declining access to defined benefit pensions. The move to a double lock needs to be considered alongside decisions on the future State Pension age and wider action to improve retirement adequacy, including increasing automatic enrolment contributions.”
|
