Pensions - Articles - UK charity pension deficits proportionately higher than FTSE


UK charities are facing pension deficits equalling a fifth of their unrestricted assets according to Hymans Robertson’s report, DB pension funding in the charitable sector. The analysis by the leading pensions and risk consultancy found that across 40 of the largest charities in England and Wales the average FRS102 pension deficit equals 18% of their unrestricted reserves.

 This relative size of the deficit is far bigger for these charities than for the average FTSE 350 company where the DB scheme deficit is only 1% of market capitalisation.

 Alistair Russell-Smith, Partner and Head of Corporate DB consulting at Hymans Robertson comments on how charities should respond: “Charities are facing the double whammy of fundraising pressures hitting income at the same time as The Pensions Regulator wants them to put more cash in to their pension schemes.

 “However, there are still some bright spots on the horizon to help charities and their pension scheme trustees strike the right balance. For example, charities tend to have far less covenant leakage than corporates. They clearly don’t pay dividends, they often have no debt, and there tends to be a strong focus on preserving reserves. All of this means pension scheme trustees may have more confidence in the long term covenant support than with a corporate. Some charities also have unencumbered assets on their balance sheet like property, which can be used to provide additional covenant support to the pension scheme. The long term covenant, bolstered where possible with security over charity assets, can support a longer recovery period for the pension scheme, freeing up cash for charitable purposes. All of this helps set a sustainable funding and investment strategy for the pension scheme with appropriate contingency plans in place. As The Pensions Regulator becomes tougher and intervenes more in pension funding in the sector, I expect this to become an increasingly important feature in a charity’s toolkit.

 “Emerging pension consolidation solutions should also be considered by charities. For example, commercial consolidators can provide a clean break to employers from their DB pension scheme at a lower cost than buy-out, and in particular could be a good way for charities participating in multi-employer schemes to exit cost effectively at the same time as improving benefit security for their members. Another pension consolidation option to consider is sectionalised DB Master Trusts, which can reduce scheme running costs by as much as 50% compared to running your own scheme, but crucially do not expose charities to the last man standing risk of traditional multi-employer schemes.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

HMRC admits it has not got a clue how many are facing fines
A new FOI response obtained by Royal London has revealed that HMRC simply do not know how many people they are fining each year over breaching rules r
75 percent of pension schemes want more investment in data
XPS Pensions Group (“XPS”) reveal 75% of those responsible for pension schemes believe more investment is needed to improve member data, according to
Hymans Robertson comment on GMP Equalisation call to action
Commenting on the GMP Equalisation Working Group’s initial guidance for good practice in GMP equalisation, Matt Davis, Head of GMP Equalisation at Hym

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.