Pensions - Articles - What the Chancellor didn't say - Budget 2013


A signal of future policy intention?

 Colin Richardson, Senior Corporate Consulting Actuary, provides additional views on the Budget from Buck Consultants:

 “This Budget was as much about what he didn’t do as what he did do. The retention of a 2% per annum inflation target is significant as to have changed to a nominal GDP target would have been a major blow to all who will have fixed incomes in retirement in any type of pension scheme. Furthermore, the pressure to reduce tax relief on pensions was extreme due to economic circumstances and to have not done so could be taken as a signal of future policy intention in this Parliament, as there will never be more pressure than now.

 “However, it wasn’t good news for annuity rates - giving the green light to further Quantitative Easing will do them no favours.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PPF marks 20 years of protection in its Annual Report
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has published its 2024/25 Annual Report and Accounts, marking its 20th anniversary with a year of strong financial p
DC pensions continue to back Net Zero despite ESG backlash
Barnett Waddingham’s latest DC Sustainability Report finds a 34% increase in allocations to funds with a climate target in the growth stage since orig
Chancellors focus on guided retirement for pensions savers
Ahead of the Mansion House speech to be delivered by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves on the evening of 15 July, Glyn Bradley, Chair of Pensions Board at t

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.