Pensions - Articles - What the Chancellor didn't say - Budget 2013


A signal of future policy intention?

 Colin Richardson, Senior Corporate Consulting Actuary, provides additional views on the Budget from Buck Consultants:

 “This Budget was as much about what he didn’t do as what he did do. The retention of a 2% per annum inflation target is significant as to have changed to a nominal GDP target would have been a major blow to all who will have fixed incomes in retirement in any type of pension scheme. Furthermore, the pressure to reduce tax relief on pensions was extreme due to economic circumstances and to have not done so could be taken as a signal of future policy intention in this Parliament, as there will never be more pressure than now.

 “However, it wasn’t good news for annuity rates - giving the green light to further Quantitative Easing will do them no favours.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Rising SPA over 60s report going without essentials
New research shows one in seven (14%) people just below State Pension age have gone without food, clothing or heating in the last year, compared to on
Member experience crucial as schemes approach endgame
DB pension schemes could risk poorer member outcomes and engagement if they fail to offer a high-quality member experience as they approach endgame, w
Comments as deferred DC membership surpasses 23 million
Broadstone and Lumera comment on new data from the ONS’ Financial Survey of Pension Schemes highlights how the UK Defined Contribution (DC) pensions s

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.