Pensions - Articles - What the Chancellor didn't say - Budget 2013


A signal of future policy intention?

 Colin Richardson, Senior Corporate Consulting Actuary, provides additional views on the Budget from Buck Consultants:

 “This Budget was as much about what he didn’t do as what he did do. The retention of a 2% per annum inflation target is significant as to have changed to a nominal GDP target would have been a major blow to all who will have fixed incomes in retirement in any type of pension scheme. Furthermore, the pressure to reduce tax relief on pensions was extreme due to economic circumstances and to have not done so could be taken as a signal of future policy intention in this Parliament, as there will never be more pressure than now.

 “However, it wasn’t good news for annuity rates - giving the green light to further Quantitative Easing will do them no favours.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Hedging comes good as yields fall
Fully hedged scheme sees funding level increase by over 1 full percentage point through February to reach strongest position since 2022. 50% hedged sc
Strong underlying support for auto enrolment reform
Over two in five (43%) business leaders say that the minimum workplace pension auto-enrolment contribution level should rise, with nearly three quarte
Master trusts to prepare for future scale requirements now
TPR sets out principles for how trustees can assess their scheme’s growth potential and prepare for proposed new scale requirements under the Pension

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.