Pensions - Articles - Willis Towers Watson comment on tPR's DB funding statement


The Pensions Regulator has published its annual defined benefit funding statement. This is particularly relevant to pension schemes undergoing actuarial valuations with effective dates in the year to 21 September 2016 (typically December 2015 or March/April 2016). Most schemes undergo a valuation every three years, with the trustees and sponsoring employer agreeing a new plan to repair any deficit.

 Commenting on the statement and accompanying analysis, Graham McLean, a senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson, said: “The Regulator says it ‘may be affordable’ for the majority of employers to clear shortfalls according to previously agreed timetables. In about half of cases, annual payments would need to at least double for that to be achieved. Even recognising that increases at the lower end of the range are most likely to be affordable, the Regulator appears to want some big contribution rises to be up for discussion.* “The contributions required will vary a lot between employers, and so will the affordability of these contributions. Many firms may want to argue that their circumstances make them the exception to the rule, and the Regulator has in any case stopped short of saying that most employers will be able to increase contributions enough to avoid any lengthening of recovery periods.

 “Nonetheless, the suggestion that many employers should potentially double their annual payments towards clearing pension deficits marks a change in tone from the Regulator.

 “When schemes facing new actuarial valuations last went through this process in 2013, the Treasury had recently announced that it was ‘taking action to shift the balance of regulation in favour of private sector investment and growth,’** and that the Regulator would be given a new objective to reflect this. The Regulator followed this up by saying that ‘as a starting point, trustees should consider whether the current level of contributions can be maintained.’*** Considering whether contributions can rise enough to put the existing recovery plan back on track is a very different place to start.

 “Funding pension schemes involves walking a tightrope: trustees want deficits to be dealt with as quickly as possible but without undermining the businesses that they will rely on in future. Employers have recently been given more flexibility; the regulatory pendulum may now be swinging back the other way.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

DC Pension Tracker Q3 2025
The Aon UK DC Pension Tracker fell over the quarter, with the younger savers seeing decreases in their expected outcomes, while the older members’ exp
Employers must take lead in retirement adequacy crisis
Employers will end up taking most of the responsibility for helping to solve the retirement adequacy problem if we are to see real and impactful chang
Two thirds of Administrators involved in pension strategy
With forthcoming legislation, from Inheritance Tax on unused pension pots to the 2025 Pension Schemes Bill set to have considerable implications for p

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.