Articles - 3 common issues with claims notifications in PI insurance


Explore key guidance on recognising claims, understanding PI policy coverage, and gathering evidence via three critical issues that shape successful claims notification. When policyholders receive a PI claim or when they encounter circumstances that may or are likely to give rise to a claim, they are strongly advised to make an early notification to their insurers. Prompt reporting of claims and circumstances not only helps mitigate financial loss but also prevents complications that can affect both the insured and the insurer.

 By Mark Perry, Associate Director and Nita Okorie, Associate – Business Development – FINEX PI, WTW

 3 common issues: Pitfalls around notifying PI claims

 01. Failure to recognise a circumstance or claim
 One of the most frequent causes of late notification is the insured’s failure to recognise a circumstance that could result in a claim. This might begin as a client complaint about a service or product, which the insured may dismiss as minor. However, if the issue escalates, such as a threat of legal action, it becomes reportable under PI policies. To reduce the risk of a declinature, it’s essential to notify your insurer promptly and within the terms of the policy, even if the matter initially seems minor.
  
 02. Coverage
 Another common pitfall occurs when policyholders are not fully aware of what their policy covers or does not cover. Some claims may fall outside the scope of coverage due to policy exclusions, limitations, or endorsements. Exclusions typically detail risks or events that are not covered, and, in some policies, these can be claims arising from fraud, dishonesty, certain contractual liabilities, or work performed outside the scope of the contract. Meanwhile, endorsements are modifications to the standard policy terms and conditions that may either broaden or restrict coverage. A clear understanding of these terms and conditions is critical to ensure your claim falls within the terms of your policy and your broker can assist with this
  
 03. Insufficient evidence or contractual information to support the claim
 Another reason for coverage issues arising with insurers is due to the lack of sufficient evidence or contractual documentation to support the insured’s position. Most policies require the insured to co-operate fully with the insurer during the claims process, which includes providing access to relevant documents including engagement letters, contracts and relevant correspondence.
 If key documents cannot be provided, it becomes significantly harder for the insurer to assess and defend the claim. Clients are advised to maintain organised records and documents to ensure that a notification to insurers can be properly evaluated and supported.
  
 Real-world scenarios: The impact of notification timing
 
 Case study: The benefits of prompt reporting
 In contrast, another client promptly reported a claim as soon as they became aware of it. The insurer swiftly appointed defence counsel, and the matter was resolved efficiently. As a result: Defence costs were minimised. The client’s claims history remained favourable, supporting better renewal terms and premium rates. The insurer noted that the client demonstrated sound risk management practices, and a trust-based relationship was maintained.
 bank
  
 Case study: The cost of delay
 A client received a Letter of Claim under the Pre-Action Protocol but failed to notify their broker or insurer for four months. By the time the claim was reported, the policy had renewed with the same insurer, and legal proceedings had already commenced due to the failure to serve a Letter of Response in time. Although the insurer could have declined the claim based on the strict notification provisions under the policy, they instead imposed additional costs due to prejudice:
  
 Premium prejudice: Had the claim been disclosed at the time of renewal, the insurer would likely have adjusted the premium to reflect the increased risk. If that is the case, the insurer may seek to retrospectively charge additional premium following receipt of the claim.
  
 Claim prejudice: The insurer lost the opportunity to defend the claim early, resulting in higher settlement costs, interest, and legal fees. This delay also negatively impacted the client’s risk profile, potentially affecting future renewal terms.
  
 Conclusion
 Timely and accurate notification of circumstances and claims is more than just a policy obligation; it’s a vital part of protecting your professional and financial position. As demonstrated, late reporting can lead to increased premiums, missed opportunities to defend a claim, and reputational damage, while early notification can significantly reduce costs and preserve favourable terms with insurers at renewal.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The next systemic risk and what AI means for investors
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the defining issues of our time. With the potential to transform how we work, communicate and make decisions, A
Telling members what matters most about retirement
Everyone working in the pensions industry should meet a group of DC members every year to help them understand why they’re doing their jobs and who th
Investment Insights Q3 2025
Ongoing trade tensions, particularly between the U.S. and China, have created uncertainty in the global economy, leading to volatility in financial ma

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.