Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

An employers guide to the pension salary sacrifice cap
Now the decision to cap the benefit of salary sacrifice on pensions at £2,000 a year has been confirmed; UK employers will need to plan for upcoming
Pension pitfalls putting employers at growing risk of errors
Employers are facing growing pension risks as rules become more complex and the minimum wage continues to rise. These risks are often hidden, but they
The cost of cash
Higher rate taxpayers with £30,000 in a taxable cash account earning 4.5% interest could earn £1,350 a year - but gain just £400 with tax and inflatio

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.