Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Compliance to competitive edge unlock the value of scenarios
Moving beyond box-ticking, scenario analysis empowers organizations to anticipate disruption, allocate resources smartly and build lasting resilience.
The next generation of trustees: preparing for the 2030s
The Pension Schemes Bill has set out a roadmap that will lead to consolidation within the pension schemes market in the run up to the 2030s. The comb
Should credit still form part of DB strategy ahead of buyin
For years, investment-grade credit has formed a fundamental part of investment strategies for DB schemes seeking to hedge movements in insurer pricing

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.