Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Why pensions still go missing in divorce settlements
For specialist divorce lawyers, the importance of properly addressing pension assets is now widely understood. Whilst efforts have been made to raise
Active portfolio management: Why active insurers are fitter
Amid the noise generated by each day’s operational activities, how can insurers be confident they’re on track to achieve their strategic goals? The sh
TPR clarifies responsible use of AI in workplace pensions
"Trust is the most valuable asset in our system" – TPR CEO urges safe and responsible adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in members' intere

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.