Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Global trends in the Gender Pensions Gap
Reporting on the Gender Pensions Gap (GPG) is set to become mandatory in the LGPS. The recent Access & Fairness consultation proposes the publication
What is aggregation and how does it work
Continuing our popular series of ‘De-mystifying Insurance’, today we focus on aggregation. So what is aggregation? What impact can it have on claims,
Strengthening financial capability and inclusion for all
Financial inclusion and capability must go hand in hand. People need knowledge, confidence and support to make informed decisions. There is a gap betw

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.