Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPR clarifies responsible use of AI in workplace pensions
"Trust is the most valuable asset in our system" – TPR CEO urges safe and responsible adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in members' intere
What fire claims reveal about modern risk interdependencies
Recent events have demonstrated how a single shop fire can escalate rapidly into a major city-centre emergency. What may begin as a contained incident
Emerging cyber risks in the pension sector
Dean Chapman examines rising cyber risks in UK pension schemes, highlighting why trustees must take stronger ownership of governance, resilience and o

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.