Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Clerical Medical exit DB pensions - A catalyst for change
With Clerical Medical deciding to exit the defined benefit pensions market, many affected schemes are now considering their options and what comes nex
Why generic natural catastrophe models leave firms exposed
If your organization relies on exposure maps and off-the-shelf natural catastrophe (nat cat) models to assess its risks and potential losses, you coul
Survivor benefits equalisation: Hidden challenges LGPS face
For many Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) funds in England and Wales, the McCloud rectification will be nearing completion or indeed now complet

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.