Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Coping with extreme climate and geopolitical uncertainty
Thriving in the face of hyper-volatility means building financial resilience using a combination of quantitative analytics and qualitative ‘storytelli
Longevity Perspectives
Industry experts Huey Fang Chen, Head of L&H Structured Solutions Asia, and Kerry McMullan, Global Head of L&H Structured Solutions, explore global tr
Advancing Data Driven Decision Making in 2026
As the general insurance landscape continues to evolve in response to shifting and growing risks, one constant remains: the need for sharper insights

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.