Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Triple lock reform: A stronger lock needs a clearer key
Why the adjusted triple lock can strengthen confidence in the State Pension. The State Pension triple lock currently increases the basic and new State
Final Day for Voting for Stars of the Future 2026
It's the your last chance to vote for our nominees in this years Stars of the Future as we close voting tonight The nominees are waiting for your
Subsidence: Are insurers prepared for compound claims cycles
Consecutive surge years may require insurers to look beyond annual notifications and manage a broader portfolio of new, existing and returning claims.

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.