Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Cyber Security: helping schemes go beyond the tick-box
“It’s not if, but when” is one of the most concerning things I hear when discussing cyber security with the industry. And the evidence to support i
AI resets business-government relationship
As AI becomes more embedded in business, governments and companies are gaining new ways to monitor, regulate, and respond to one another. The result i
How insurance can help make CCS projects viable
Inconsistent regulation is creating barriers to widespread and rapid carbon capture, transport and storage adoption, but insurance could help to fill

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.