Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Collective Defined Contribution: Learning from the Dutch
The Dutch pension system is a mythical paradox: on the one hand it is known as the ‘best’ pension system in the world, ranked 1st in the Mercer Global
Retail, leisure and hospitality: Cutting out AI fraud claims
AI can make fraudulent claims look more credible, especially when your teams are under pressure. How can going ‘back to basics’ help protect your reta
Mercer Investment Insights Q3 2026
Investment markets bounced back last quarter, but what may this mean for the months ahead? In this edition of Investment Insights, Mercer New Zealand’

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.