Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Artificial intelligence and pensions: Cyber risk
This is the third in a series that takes a deeper look at areas relevant to U.K. pension schemes and how artificial intelligence (AI) may have a signi
The four dimensions of reserving uncertainty
This article presents a framework that I have found helpful in working with general insurance firms to better manage their reserving risks. The four d
Strategies for defined contribution pension arrangements
Three areas of focus that companies can build into their strategy to help their defined contribution arrangements stand up to adverse conditions. Turb

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.