Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

PRAs life insurance stress test
Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) LIST25 stress test assesses UK bulk purchase annuity insurers' resilience under severe scenarios, with fi
Balancing higher pension costs with retention
With the government re-establishing the Pensions Commission, attention is turning again to auto-enrolment. Minimum contributions have been stuck for y
Stars of the Future 2025 Edition of Actuarial Post Magazine
Our Stars of the Future 2025 take centre stage in the magazine this month. We would like to congratulate our overall winner Paul Ring from Chubb who i

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.