Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Pension policy's long distance roadmap
The Pensions Schemes Bill has fired the starting pistol on a marathon set of proposals for pension change. The passage of the Pension Schemes Bill and
Guided Retirement Duty a promise or pipe dream for savers
The Pensions Policy Institute (PPI), sponsored by The Pensions Regulator (TPR), recently highlighted a key challenge for defined contribution (DC) pen
Design Thinking in practice starting with Empathy
You may ask “But why bring empathy into pensions?”. Checking your projected pension or receiving a correct payment each month - surely this is all jus

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.