Articles - AIG v Woodman analysis from Rosling King


Georgina Squire from Rosling King analyses the impact on the insurance sector of a recent test case where the Supreme Court issued a judgment on aggregation clauses which mean that related claims can be heard as one claim. This is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to consider an aggregation clause since the Lloyds TSB case in 2003. The Supreme Court has scrapped the “Intrinsic Test” altogether and clarified the principles in the Lloyds TSB case. The clarification is useful but ultimately the Court has stressed that this is a very fact-sensitive area and each case will have to be decided in the round.

 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Longer working lives require more flexible pension support
This year, 6 April marked the date from which the state pension age started to rise to 67. Over the next two years the age will steadily rise to reach
Without a design shift Life Insurance risks irrelevance
Life insurance was always designed around one moment: death, and for much of its history, that made perfect sense. Families were often built around a
Car insurance rollercoaster: Is 2025 simply momentary relief
While 2025 was a welcome period of relative stability for UK motor insurance, the latest cycle is faster and more extreme – better cycle management is

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.