Pensions - Articles - Government dragging its heels on pensions equality


The Government’s response this week to a landmark court judgment shows that it is ‘dragging its heels’ on pensions equality according to Royal London policy director, Steve Webb.

 On July 4th 2019, the pensions minister, Guy Opperman, finally made a written statement to Parliament (see notes) in response to a decision two years ago by the Supreme Court in a case known as the ‘Walker Judgment’. Mr Walker had taken the Innospec Pension Scheme to court because as a member of a same-sex couple he would not be entitled to the same pension if his partner were to die as a member of an opposite sex couple would receive. This was because the law only gave him entitlement for service since 2005, when Civil Partnerships were created. In July 2017, the Supreme Court found in his favour and, two years later, the Government has agreed to implement the necessary changes for public sector pension schemes. Private sector pension schemes will also be expected to follow the judgment to the extent that they do not already do so.

 However, in a little-noticed second part of the statement, the Minister referred to a wider review of ‘survivor’ benefits in pension schemes. That review was published back in 2014 but the Government has only now responded to it. And it has decided to take no action in response to the inequalities set out in that review. The particular group that will lose out as a result of the government’s continuing inaction will be widowers who will, for many years to come, generally get poorer benefits following the death of their wife than a widow would get following the death of her husband. It is estimated that putting this inequality right would cost public sector pension schemes several billion pounds.

 Commenting, Steve Webb, Director of Policy at Royal London said: ‘When leading politicians can find billions of pounds to spend on their spending priorities, it is deeply disappointing that the money cannot now be found to put right a historic inequality in the pensions system. The report published in 2014 made clear that there remain clear unfairnesses between men and women in pensions, and yet five years later the government still does not think that this issue is worth addressing. A generation of widowers will lose out as a result’.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

The PPF launch the 14th edition of The Purple Book
In its fourteenth edition of The Purple Book, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) reveals a strong link between investment risk and underfunding in defi
Industry comment on the 14th edition of the PPFs Purple Book
Industry comment from Hymans Robertson Lincoln Pensions and Clara Pensions on the 14th edition of the PPFs Purple Book
Final report of ACA 2019 Pension trends survey
ACA survey report says momentum of pension reform needs to be built upon with plans set out to increase automatic enrolment minimum contributions alon

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.