Articles - Why covenant comes first

Trustees are often given verbal assurances from their sponsors or parent companies that they will always be looked after. Unfortunately, such promises are not recognised by the Regulator and this is an area they are increasingly looking to trustees for better standards of practice. Boards should be finding out how enforceable such promises are and considering what written guarantees or contingency assets could be provided to them.

 By Ruth Thomas FIA, Partner at Barnett Waddingham

 Our recent survey of trustees indicates that few have done this.The Regulator’s integrated risk management guidance wants all risk measures assessed together to find what relationships lie between them. In that context, we believe the relative strength of the employer’s covenant is the starting point for such risk management. This is critical for assessing where trustees set their technical provisions, recovery plans and investment strategy.

 A guarantee from a sponsor or parent company would allow trustees to consider taking more risk in their investments or potentially shortening their recovery plan. These are the sorts of steps the Regulator wants more evidence of.

 It might be a difficult question for trustees to ask a healthy sponsor for a cash injection but this is a conversation that is happening more and more. Such contributions can guard against a time in the future when either the sponsor or the scheme might be in a worse position.

 Where sponsors are already in a weak position, this can be a starting point for a conversation around the length of recovery plans, for instance, how a guarantee given by an employer or an overseas parent could help restructure recovery plans in ways that are mutually beneficial.

 Lastly, trustees need to think more about how they assess the health of the sponsor over time as well as in the short term. Is the sponsor gaining or losing market share? Do they operate in a declining market? The overall covenant needs to be monitored in the same way funding ratios and the performance of fund managers are. We recommend that trustees consider the issue of covenant on a regular basis and take outside advice where necessary.

Back to Index

Similar News to this Story

Risk Sharing in DC
Risk sharing is about distributing potential losses or gains among different parties. For instance, in the context of retirement planning, risk sharin
Upgrading insurance software and the key drivers to change
Sometimes, the only solution is to change the solution. Changing anything from something you are comfortable with to something new is never an easy pr
Updated guidance on pensions on divorce
Research by the Nuffield Foundation, Bristol University and Bryson Purdon Social Research shows that that of the 100,000 divorces each year only aroun

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS


Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.