Articles - A year with no deficit is it time to rethink pension funding


The UK’s 5,000-plus corporate defined benefit (DB) pension schemes have overall remained in a surplus position over the last year, according to PwC’s Pension Trustee Funding Index. Asset and liability values both fell over January 2022, still leaving a surplus of £30bn based on schemes’ own ongoing funding measures. PwC’s Adjusted Funding Index shows a £200bn surplus - this incorporates strategic changes available for most pension funds.

 This includes a move away from low-yielding gilt investments to higher-return, income-generating assets, and a different approach for potential life expectancy changes.

 Raj Mody, global head of pensions at PwC, said: “In an unprecedented run, pension schemes have remained out of deficit for over 12 months. Despite inflation hitting a 30-year high, it’s likely that the surplus trend will be sustained. The inflation situation may even generate a greater surplus. Although pension scheme benefits are linked to inflation, the increases are typically subject to a cap. In most schemes this cap is lower than the current rate of inflation, so scheme liabilities are not fully exposed to inflation volatility. This will give some protection to the funding health of most schemes, and potentially see even more surplus created as inflation tensions eventually subside.

 “Running a pension scheme with significant surplus can cause challenges for trustees. Their powers are not always well designed to deal with such situations. There can be pressure to spend some of the surplus on improving member benefits, which might sound appealing for members, but can be difficult for trustees to act fairly between different categories of membership. Surpluses can also lead to investment and tax inefficiencies.”

 Laura Treece, pensions actuary at PwC, added: “Many well-funded schemes are now on the brink of being able to take action to secure members’ benefits for good. But their sponsors are increasingly concerned about putting in more cash than is needed to do so. They know that if they overshoot the amount required it will be hard to get the excess back. In this new world of persistent surpluses, trustees and sponsors need to re-evaluate the best way of managing their schemes towards their long-term goals.

 “Even if the ultimate target is some kind of insurance buy-out, instead of continuing to pay cash into an already well funded scheme, sponsors could pay this into a separate funding vehicle. This money can be used to support the pension scheme, but won’t be tied up if not all of it is needed. It would help avoid future stranded surplus, and the associated loss of value.”

 

  The Pension Trustee Funding Index and Adjusted Funding Index figures are as follows:
   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Closing the net on ghost brokers with email intelligence
As households face the biggest economic squeeze in generations , finding ways to cut the cost of everyday but essential living expenses such as moto
10 Plus C level Claims Executives share their insights
C-level claims executives from Arch, Aviva Canada, Berkley Mid-Atlantic Group and SageSure have just been announced as speakers for Intelligent Insure
Recycling knowledge to fuel green investments
Thursday is ‘bin night’ in my household. A day not to be forgotten if I want to avoid overflowing bins for the next week. It is also the weekly opport

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.