Articles - Bitcoin and the environment


Bitcoin’s recent extraordinary rally has brought it to the attention of investors. Simultaneously, the drive for sustainable investing and environmentally friendly (or at least neutral) investment continues to grow. Are they compatible? So what do the numbers say? It’s difficult to contextualise, so we show the figures for VISA, an alternative but more traditional form of digital currency, alongside it.

 By Alex White, Head of ALM Research at Redington
 
 How much Bitcoin is traded varies wildly (both trade amounts and price), so the numbers are quite unstable, but it’s now jumped to around $60bn per day , or around $22tn annually. VISA processes a much more stable amount, around $8-9 trillion USD per year, and Mastercard covers about $6tn. So more is now traded on Bitcoin than on VISA and Mastercard combined.

 However, it takes a lot to power Bitcoin. For Bitcoin, we have to make a lot more estimates, but we can probably get the right order of magnitude if we assume most of the energy is used mining bitcoins (trying different random options to see if, when hashed (coded in a complicated way that means very similar inputs give very different outputs), the result passes some easily tested criteria (eg starting with ten zeros)
 • Currently, bitcoin mining software completes around 150 terahashes per second
 • The most efficient programs run at 19 gigahashes/joule
 • That would suggest at least c70TwH per year are used by Bitcoin
 • As corroboration, more sophisticated estimates put it at c80TWh

 For context, VISA uses about 200GWh each year, so around 0.25% as much as Bitcoin. As a different way of contextualizing Bitcoin’s use, it’s about ¼ as much as the entire UK.
 • On a volume-adjusted basis, even with the price so high, that’s still around 200 times more energy per $ traded than VISA
 • That’s on a volume basis. On a transaction basis, VISA implements 65,000 transactions per second , whereas Bitcoin implements around 400,000 per day
 • On this basis, VISA is roughly 50,000 times more efficient than Bitcoin, which is not suited to small trades.

 Unfortunately that’s not all of it. Bitcoin miners tend to position themselves where energy is cheapest. That tends to mean China.

 Unfortunately, China also uses a lot of coal, and Bitcoin miners seem to use a disproportionate amount of coal. And the future is probably worse, for two reasons:
 • The price has jumped recently, meaning the pull of supply-demand probably hasn’t kicked in fully yet. We might expect more miners and higher electricity use
 • By design, each block takes more and more work- so each bitcoin is harder to mine than the last. We should expect the energy usage to continue to rise dramatically.

 There are mitigants. Bitcoin further incentivises cheap electricity, and could lead to more efficient computing or self-sustaining facilities. Right now though, there are some serious environmental concerns. If sustainability is a priority, Bitcoin may be one investment to avoid.

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Inflation risk premium why think about it now
An inflation risk premium (IRP) is nothing new. Market-implied inflation has historically been higher than actual realised inflation. There is only
Workplace emergency savings
Nest Insight event dedicated to workplace emergency savings, where we’ll share the latest findings from our research trials and hear from other practi
How to identify the key issues early in reserving
This article looks at how an analytical approach to reserving can help actuaries focus on what really matters, right at the start of the process. We s

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.