 |
|
|
| View More Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FTC: Senior Life Actuarial Analyst - ... | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Pensions Redress Consultant /Consulta... | ||
| Work From Home Base - Negotiable | ||
| Risk Manager | ||
| London - £90,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Actuary - Motor Lines | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Actuary – Capital Modelling | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Actuary - Non-life | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Part-qualified Actuary – Non-life Rei... | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Part-qualified Actuary - Casualty Team | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Reserving Actuary | ||
| London - £90,000 Per Annum | ||
| Syndicate Reserving Actuary | ||
| London - £60,000 to £80,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Life Consultant-Big 4 Consulti... | ||
| Bermuda - $110,000 to $150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Life Consultant-Big 4 Consulti... | ||
| Hong Kong - Negotiable | ||
| Lead Pricing Actuary - New York | ||
| New York - Negotiable | ||
| Pensions Consultant | ||
| Manchester - Negotiable | ||
| Senior Pensions Consultant | ||
| Birmingham - Negotiable | ||
| Risk Pricing Actuary - Life | ||
| South East / Remote / Agile - Negotiable | ||
| Senior GI Pricing Analyst | ||
| 54 - Negotiable | ||
| Actuarial Modelling and Systems Analy... | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Pensions Technician | ||
| London or Leeds - Negotiable | ||
| Pricing Manager | ||
| Work from home with occasional travel to the office in the South East of England - Negotiable | ||
LATEST EDITION - OUT NOW
Copyright © 2021 Actuarial Post. Created by Zero-One Design Ltd
Following the publication of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) policy statement on general insurance pricing practices , it is clear that a deeper understanding of the customer will be critical in this new regulatory environment and will almost certainly demand a much more granular level of risk assessment as part of the renewal process.
One challenge worth making is why the 95th percentile is so commonly used as the standard risk measure. For several assets, such as individual bonds, ILS and options, it arguably understates the risk that can lurk in the tail. So why not be more conservative and use, for instance, the 99th, or 99.5th, percentile as the main risk metric?